Injured on a construction site in Salt Lake City or Salt Lake County? Our local construction accident lawyers fight for your rights and pursue maximum compensation.
A Salt Lake City construction accident lawyer helps injured workers and families determine which companies may be responsible after a serious job-site accident. Strong Law Accident & Injury Attorneys investigates the project structure, contracts, safety duties, equipment, insurance policies, and site records that may affect the claim.
After a construction injury, workers’ compensation may be only part of the legal picture. It can provide important medical and disability benefits, but it generally does not cover pain and suffering or every dollar of lost income. If an outside contractor, equipment company, driver, property owner, or another third party helped cause the accident, a separate injury claim may provide broader compensation.
Construction projects often involve a property owner, general contractor, several subcontractors, equipment companies, delivery drivers, and outside vendors. The company that issued the worker’s paycheck may not be the only business connected to the accident.
Strong Law serves Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County from its nearby Utah office in Midvale. We help people injured on downtown building projects, airport and industrial construction, road and utility work, renovations, demolition projects, and other construction sites throughout the area.
Legal help may be important when a construction accident caused surgery, hospitalization, a brain injury, burns, fractures, lost work, permanent limits, or the death of a family member.
An early case review can also matter when several companies worked at the site, equipment was repaired or removed after the accident, a contractor blames the worker, or important video and project records may disappear.
Construction cases can become difficult quickly. Each company may point at another contractor, deny control over the unsafe area, or claim that the injured person’s employer was solely responsible. A prompt investigation can help identify who controlled the work, who created the danger, and which records or physical evidence must be preserved.
A construction injury may create a workers’ compensation claim, a third-party injury claim, or both.
Workers’ compensation generally provides defined medical and disability benefits without requiring an employee to prove ordinary employer negligence. Utah law also generally requires an injured employee to use the workers’ compensation system instead of suing a properly covered employer for an ordinary job-related injury. This is often called the exclusive-remedy rule.
You can review the general employer-immunity rule in Utah Code § 34A-2-105.
A separate third-party claim may exist against another person or company that helped cause the accident. This may include an outside contractor, equipment manufacturer, property owner, delivery company, or driver. Utah Code § 34A-2-106 permits qualifying claims against responsible third parties, although workers’ compensation reimbursement and credit rights may affect the final recovery.
The two claims do not provide the same benefits. Workers’ compensation may pay covered treatment and part of the worker’s lost wages. A third-party lawsuit may also seek compensation for pain, emotional distress, full income loss, reduced earning ability, and other losses that workers’ compensation does not cover.
For detailed information about injury reporting, workers’ compensation doctors, benefit disputes, denied claims, and Utah Labor Commission procedures, visit our Salt Lake City work injury lawyer page.
Responsibility depends on what each person or company agreed to do, what it controlled, and how the accident happened. A company’s title on the project does not automatically make it liable.
Potentially responsible parties may include:
An architect or engineer may also be involved when a professional duty and a design or inspection error contributed to the injury.
Contracts, scopes of work, daily logs, safety plans, and witness accounts may show who had authority over the area, crew, equipment, or task. Strong Law examines the actual job-site relationships instead of relying only on company names.
Construction cases often involve more evidence and more insurance policies than an ordinary injury claim.
A serious accident may require review of the main construction contract, subcontracts, project plans, change orders, safety programs, inspection records, equipment files, and communications between companies. The investigation may also need to determine who had authority to stop unsafe work.
The physical scene can change quickly. A scaffold may be taken apart, a trench may be filled, damaged equipment may be repaired, and construction may continue in the area where the accident happened.
Workers’ compensation and third-party claims must also be coordinated. A statement, medical opinion, or settlement agreement in one matter may affect the other. That makes early planning especially important.
Salt Lake City has commercial, residential, airport, road, utility, industrial, and public construction throughout the city.
Construction settings may include downtown high-rise and mixed-use projects, multifamily housing, renovations, seismic upgrades, west-side industrial work, warehouse development, utility excavation, bridge projects, and work zones near I-15, I-80, and I-215. Salt Lake City also publishes information about street reconstruction and utility projects throughout the city.
Salt Lake City projects often combine tight downtown access, active street traffic, utility work, delivery schedules, and several trades working in limited space. Those conditions can make traffic-control plans, delivery logs, daily reports, site photographs, and contractor messages especially important after an accident.
These are examples of local construction environments. They are not claims that a particular project, employer, contractor, or location is unsafe.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration identifies four main groups of serious construction hazards: falls, caught-in or between incidents, struck-by hazards, and electrocution.
Falls may occur from roofs, ladders, scaffolds, lifts, steel, temporary stairs, unguarded openings, or unfinished floors.
Important evidence may include fall-protection plans, harnesses, anchor points, guardrail records, scaffold tags, ladder inspections, lift records, and training documents.
Workers may be struck by falling tools, swinging loads, construction materials, vehicles, cranes, forklifts, or heavy equipment.
Delivery logs, spotter procedures, barricades, crane plans, rigging records, and equipment-camera footage may help explain what happened.
These incidents may involve trench collapses, machinery, rotating equipment, vehicles, structural materials, or workers pinned between equipment and a fixed object.
On trench and excavation work, a “competent person” is someone assigned to identify certain hazards and take prompt corrective action. Inspection records may show whether that person examined the area and responded to unsafe conditions.
Machine cases may also involve lockout/tagout procedures. Lockout/tagout is a safety process used to isolate energy and keep machinery from starting while it is being serviced or repaired.
Electrical injuries may result from overhead power lines, exposed wiring, damaged tools, temporary power systems, missing grounding, or contact between equipment and energized lines.
These incidents may cause burns, heart injury, nerve damage, falls, permanent disability, or death.
Construction injuries are not limited to the Focus Four.
Other cases may involve crane or rigging failures, scaffold collapse, forklift accidents, defective power tools, explosions, fires, chemical exposure, silica dust, demolition work, structural collapse, roadwork crashes, unsafe excavation, and machinery that was not properly maintained.
A construction worker may also be hurt in a vehicle collision while moving between sites, transporting materials, or working in an active road zone. Those cases may overlap with issues addressed on our Salt Lake City truck accident lawyer and Salt Lake City car accident lawyer pages.
Utah Occupational Safety and Health, commonly called UOSH, administers workplace safety enforcement in Utah. Its work can include inspections, document requests, employee interviews, citations, and orders requiring a hazard to be corrected.
After a serious construction accident, possible records may include an employer accident report, inspection notes, photographs, injury logs, interviews, safety programs, training records, citations, and proof that a hazard was corrected.
Utah requires employers to report certain serious workplace accidents to UOSH within eight hours. The reporting duty belongs to the employer, but the report and any later investigation may become important evidence.
A UOSH or OSHA violation does not automatically prove a civil construction case or guarantee workers’ compensation benefits. However, a citation or inspection record may help show that a hazard existed, who had notice of it, and which company was assigned to control or correct it.
Construction claims often depend on records that do not exist in an ordinary accident case.
Important evidence may include:
The tool, machine, scaffold part, ladder, harness, vehicle, or other physical evidence should be preserved before it is repaired, discarded, returned to a rental company, or tested in a way that changes its condition.
Workers should keep copies of photographs, messages, reports, and other records they already possess. They should not remove confidential company records they are not legally allowed to take.
A contractor or insurer may claim the worker ignored training, failed to use protective equipment, entered a restricted area, used the wrong ladder, removed a guard, or operated equipment without permission.
The defense may also argue that the worker created the hazard, worked for a different contractor, was an independent contractor, had a pre-existing injury, or fully recovered because they returned to work.
Those arguments should be tested against the full record. The evidence may show that protective equipment was unavailable, training was incomplete, the schedule encouraged unsafe shortcuts, a supervisor approved the task, or another company created the condition.
Worker conduct affects workers’ compensation and a third-party lawsuit differently. Workers’ compensation is generally no-fault, subject to legal exclusions and defenses. In a third-party case, Utah comparative-fault rules may reduce or prevent recovery based on how responsibility is divided.
Under Utah Code § 78B-5-818, recovery may be available in a third-party injury case when the combined fault assigned to the defendants and other responsible parties is greater than the injured person’s fault.
The recovery may then be reduced by the worker’s percentage of responsibility. For example, if total damages were $500,000 and the worker were assigned 20% of the fault, the recovery could be reduced to $400,000.
An insurer’s fault decision is not final. Contracts, safety records, video, witness accounts, supervision, equipment condition, and expert analysis may support a different result.
The available recovery depends on whether the matter involves workers’ compensation, a third-party claim, or both.
Workers’ compensation may provide reasonable and necessary medical treatment, part of the worker’s lost wages, temporary disability benefits, permanent disability benefits, and certain benefits for dependents after a qualifying death.
Workers’ compensation generally does not pay ordinary pain and suffering or the full value of every lost paycheck.
Economic damages address measurable financial losses. They may include medical treatment, future care, past and future income loss, reduced earning ability, rehabilitation, travel costs, and household help.
Non-economic damages address the human impact of the injury. They may include physical pain, emotional distress, scarring, disfigurement, disability, and loss of the ability to enjoy normal activities.
When an injury causes permanent disability, treating doctors, rehabilitation professionals, vocational experts, economists, or life-care planners may help explain future medical needs and the long-term effect on earning ability. Whether those professionals are needed depends on the facts.
The workers’ compensation carrier may have reimbursement or credit rights involving part of the third-party recovery, so the two claims must be coordinated.
Severe head trauma may involve the medical and functional evidence discussed on our Salt Lake City brain injury lawyer page. Permanent disability or lifetime care may overlap with our Salt Lake City catastrophic injury lawyer page.
If the accident caused a death, the family may need separate guidance about heirs, estate issues, survival claims, and death-related damages. Those issues are addressed on our Salt Lake City wrongful death lawyer page.
Construction accidents can involve several deadlines.
A work injury should be reported promptly. Detailed workers’ compensation reporting and hearing rules are explained on the Salt Lake City work injury lawyer page.
Many Utah negligence-based third-party lawsuits generally have a four-year filing period under Utah Code § 78B-2-307.
A fatal construction accident generally involves a two-year wrongful-death filing period under Utah Code § 78B-2-304.
A claim involving a city, public agency, public employee, or government project may require a formal written notice within one year under Utah Code § 63G-7-402.
Product, professional-negligence, and other specialized claims may follow different rules. Do not wait for the longest possible period. Video may be overwritten, equipment may be repaired or returned, and project records may become harder to obtain.
Strong Law looks beyond the incident report and workers’ compensation file. We investigate the contracts, project hierarchy, safety records, equipment history, and insurance coverage that may reveal responsibility outside the injured worker’s employer.
Before representing injured people, attorney Jed Strong worked as in-house counsel for GEICO. That experience helps the team recognize insurer efforts to shift blame, narrow medical causation, limit available coverage, and pressure injured people into early settlements.
Strong Law has handled more than 2,000 successful cases across its offices. Our Midvale office has a 4.8-star Google rating from 162 reviews and serves clients throughout Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County.
The scope of representation, attorney fee, and any case-cost terms are explained before you hire the firm. For third-party construction injury matters handled on a contingency basis, attorney fees are not owed unless compensation is recovered.
"Just wanted to say thank you to Jed and his team at Strong Law. Not only was I happy with the outcome, but the entire process as a whole. I would definitely recommend this firm to anyone. Thanks again."
"I had a claim involving my own insurance company. I tried to negotiate with them, and they completely denied my claim – two times. I then hired Strong Law, and the change was instant. The insurance company immediately began negotiating, and Jed was able to secure an unbelievably good settlement. I will never again attempt to take-on an insurance company without Strong Law in my corner. Thank you!"
"I hired Strong Law after my car accident. Jed and his team worked hard on my case. They were professional and compassionate through my surgery and as I recovered, and they were awesome on communication. I got justice and awesome compensation. I would recommend Strong Law to anyone in my situation."
Possibly. A third-party claim may exist against a general contractor, subcontractor, property owner, equipment company, manufacturer, delivery company, or another outside business that helped cause the accident.
Yes, in qualifying cases. The claims must be coordinated because the workers’ compensation insurer may have reimbursement or credit rights involving part of the third-party recovery.
Responsibility depends on the contracts, work assignments, project control, safety duties, notice of the hazard, and what caused the accident. More than one company may share fault.
Not by itself. A citation, inspection record, training failure, or missing safety procedure may still provide important evidence about the hazard, who knew about it, and which company was responsible for controlling it.
Important records may include contracts, daily logs, safety plans, toolbox talks, training files, equipment inspections, maintenance records, video, incident reports, UOSH records, and communications between contractors.
A claim may involve the manufacturer, seller, rental company, repair business, maintenance company, or contractor that selected or controlled the equipment. The product should be preserved before repair or destructive testing.
Utah comparative-fault rules may reduce compensation. A third-party recovery may be available when the combined fault of the defendants and other responsible parties is greater than your own fault.
The label does not always control. The actual relationship, degree of control, contract terms, payment structure, and work arrangement may affect workers’ compensation and third-party rights.
A government claim may require a formal written notice within one year and may follow special procedures. The project contracts should also be reviewed because a private contractor may share responsibility.
Many Utah negligence-based third-party claims generally have a four-year filing period. Fatal, government, product, professional-negligence, and other specialized claims may have shorter or different requirements.
Strong Law explains the attorney fee and any case-cost terms before representation begins. For third-party construction injury claims handled on contingency, attorney fees are not owed unless compensation is recovered.
Strong Law’s Utah office is in Midvale. From that office, we serve clients throughout Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, and nearby communities.
A serious construction accident can involve several companies, several insurance policies, and evidence that changes or disappears quickly.
Strong Law can investigate the project, preserve records and equipment, identify responsible third parties, document the full loss, and help protect the claim.
Contact Strong Law Accident & Injury Attorneys or call 206-741-1053 for a free case review.
We review reports, photos, video, witness information, medical records, and other evidence to identify what happened and who may be responsible.
We gather medical, wage, property, and daily-life evidence to show how the injury or loss affected the client.
We identify available insurance, manage insurer communication, and respond to delays, low offers, and attempts to shift blame.
If the other side denies responsibility or refuses a fair resolution, we can file a lawsuit and prepare the case for court.
Before founding Strong Law, attorney Jed worked as in-house counsel for GEICO, defending insurance companies in accident and injury claims. That experience helps our team understand how insurers evaluate claims, dispute injuries, and decide when to settle. We use that knowledge to build stronger claims for injured people.
You owe us nothing unless we recover compensation for you. There is no obligation to hire us after your consultation and no hidden attorney fees along the way.
Our team does more than process paperwork. We answer your questions, explain your options, track important deadlines, and help you understand each step of the injury claim.
We will review your injury claim at no cost and explain your options clearly. The goal is to help you protect your health, your claim, and your financial recovery after a serious accident or injury.
Our team is standing by to help you.