How Comparative Fault Works in Oregon

Comparative fault in Oregon determines how responsibility is shared when more than one party contributes to an accident. Oregon law allows injured people to recover compensation as long as they are not more than 50 percent at fault.

Comparative fault refers to the process of assigning a percentage of responsibility to each party involved in an accident. This percentage affects whether compensation is available and how much may be recovered.

In Oregon, fault can be assigned to drivers, property owners, pedestrians, or other parties depending on the circumstances of the incident.

Oregon’s modified comparative fault rule

Oregon follows a modified comparative fault system. An injured person may recover compensation only if they are 50 percent or less at fault for the accident.

If a person is found to be more than 50 percent responsible, they are barred from recovering damages under Oregon law.

How fault percentages affect compensation

When an injured person is partially at fault, any compensation awarded is typically reduced by their percentage of responsibility.

For example, if a person is found to be 20 percent at fault, any damages awarded would generally be reduced by 20 percent.

Comparative fault in personal injury cases

Comparative fault is commonly raised in Oregon personal injury cases involving car accidents, pedestrian incidents, bicycle crashes, and premises liability claims.

Insurance companies often dispute fault percentages as part of claim negotiations.

Time limits still apply to comparative fault claims

Even when fault is disputed, Oregon’s statute of limitations still applies. Most personal injury lawsuits must be filed within two years under Oregon Revised Statutes § 12.110.

Related Oregon personal injury law pages

This page explains how comparative fault works under Oregon law and is intended for general informational purposes.